Skip to main content

SAP Simple Finance Controlling Questions and Considerations To Know

Different split of the modules with a lot of new areas for Treasury
Look into Cash Management/In-House Cash/ Bank Communications etc. House-banks for example have moved to a different module which is chargeable but there is a Bank Account Management LITE version so that you can still use the standard banking if you don’t have those modules
Account-based COPA is the default – although can implement both
Revenue recognition changes coming with IFRS 15, and the SD Revenue Recognition being replaced in by Revenue Accounting and Reporting.
Revenue recognition now in Universal journal and recognized as they incur – look into further – 2 postings one for initial costs/revenue and a separate posting for revenue recognition and new SAP Fiori (Learn from SAP FIORI training by experts) transactions/apps.
COPA data now in finance.
Check - standard credit management no longer available – only FSCM (Financial Supply Chain Management) Credit Management? What FSCM offers see SAP FSCM training overview.
Additional currencies available (from 1610 up to 10) – do you need this functionality?
Extension/Appendix ledgers (normal ledgers hold complete sets of books, these only hold deltas and are linked to a base ledger so that reporting gives a complete set by combining the base and extension ledger)
Check Cost of Goods Sold - more flexibility and a number of improvements (e.g. multiple accounts based on cost component split) but check whether when COGS in profitability analysis will be supported.


Finance, Controlling, COPA
Effectively merged, so cost element now part of GL account (and cost category field available in GL master).  In Finance, there is a new kind of document called the Universal Journal which posts to a single table (ACDOCA) which contains a lot of data from the other modules, so instead of having to run reports from a number of tables, you can now see almost everything in Finance, for example in line items, including COPA, SAP MM, SAP SD etc. Leads to Single Source of Truth i.e. you don’t have different results in different modules.

Considerations/Questions: 
  • Different split of the modules with a lot of new areas for Treasury
  • Look into Cash Management/In-House Cash/ Bank Communications etc. House-banks for example have moved to a different module which is chargeable but there is a Bank Account Management LITE version so that you can still use the standard banking if you don’t have those modules
  • Account-based COPA is the default – although can implement both
  • Revenue recognition changes coming with IFRS 15, and the SD Revenue Recognition being replaced in by Revenue Accounting and Reporting.
  • Revenue recognition now in Universal journal and recognized as they incur – look into further – 2 postings one for initial costs/revenue and a separate posting for revenue recognition and new SAP Fiori (Learn from SAP FIORI training by experts) transactions/apps.
  • COPA data now in finance.
  • Check - standard credit management no longer available – only FSCM (Financial Supply Chain Management) Credit Management? What FSCM offers see SAP FSCM training overview.
  • Additional currencies available (from 1610 up to 10) – do you need this functionality?
  • Extension/Appendix ledgers (normal ledgers hold complete sets of books, these only hold deltas and are linked to a base ledger so that reporting gives a complete set by combining the base and extension ledger)
  • Check Cost of Goods Sold - more flexibility and a number of improvements (e.g. multiple accounts based on cost component split) but check whether when COGS in profitability analysis will be supported.
 New GL
Considerations/Questions:
  • If not already on new GL, don’t necessarily need all the new functionality, but recommend to set up in the beginning if you think you may need it in the future (document splitting can be tricky)
  • Document Splitting – not mandatory but previously it was not possible to implement once on S/4 HANA – have to do it before (check this – it was due to be added soon)
  • Parallel ledgers cannot be added in earlier versions of on-premise – only1610 versions – check how it works on cloud.

New Asset Controlling
In addition to better reconciliation, there is no data redundancy as you no longer need delta depreciation areas, real-time postings to all ledgers etc. Some considerations are below:

Considerations/Questions:
  • New Asset Accounting is the only option on Hana, although available in ECC6 from enhancement pack 7
  • During a system conversion, there will be some customizing changes to do particularly for new Asset Accounting, important to understand and decide in advance whether you want to follow ledger or account approach for different accounting principles (even account approach now requires a “dummy ledger” to be configured)
  • Even if Greenfield implementation, you will probably have some restructuring to do. Need to match ledgers and currencies and depreciation areas and accounting principles.
  • You may see a lot of information about the New depreciation calculation engine. Generally, hardly any difference between the old and new calculations unless you are changing depreciation methods/useful lives mid-year - may be worth looking into that more if that is the case

Customer Vendor Integration
Vendor and customer master data held as BP (Business Partner) - if you have a customer that is also a vendor – use same general data (address), more data fields and addresses available, concept of relationship e.g. with contact person. Still keep original customer vendor number (so historic reports ok) but may have new BP number as well. Part of migration step is to synchronize customers and vendors to BP if not already using. 
Considerations/Questions:
May need to clean up vendors/customers if not using BP and see if any fields exist in BP that were not in old transactions. If not linked may need to decide if you want to link them, how that would be done.
Check bespoke fields in the customer/vendor masters.
Material Ledger
Material Ledger now mandatory.  Change in tables (MATDOC =main table in material ledger), lot more information in Finance.
  • Some field lengths change (e.g. Material length now 40 characters) – check any other systems feeding in can deal with increased length here and elsewhere.
  • Multiple currencies and valuations.
  • Check transfer pricing functionality.
  • Check capture of price variances.

IDOCS
Check whether still available and whether any changes e.g. DEBMAS and CREMAS (for customer and vendor) still available but may using the BP number as leading object.
Authorizations
Considerations/Questions:
  • Fiori will work differently in any case, (one transaction may be split into roles) but if not using GUI should be standardized roles available for new implementation.
  • There are a number of new GUI transactions that are almost identical to the old but allow for example to post to each ledger group separately so if conversion will need to add them to roles.
  • If converting an existing landscape, there are a number of tasks as part of the migration to convert for example the cost elements into GL accounts, but going forward you will need to review authorizations e.g.  if different people have access to costements and GL accounts master data.
Licensing and Hosting
Varies greatly between the different options and landscapes. From subscription to itemizing everything out separately.

Considerations/Questions:
  • Some programs such as SAP MDG (Master Data Governance) are based on each object for example if you want to use MDG for 5,000 GL accounts, 50,000 vendors, 2,000 cost centers, 10,000 customers, 5,0000 vendors, 20,000 materials that would be 92,000 items, and you may therefore need to buy the next available quantity that they are sold in e.g. 100,000
  • Many of the financial packages are licensed based on revenue, regardless of whether you are only using IHC (In-house cash) for your vendors, and not customers/Treasury/intercompany etc.
  • Types of users (used to have developer, self-service, professional, etc.)
  • Is there a separate charge for HANA database?
  • Charge for Fiori?
  • Maybe review existing licenses – it may be possible to save money by reorganizing the assignment of licenses - not sure if reduced licenses still apply e.g. if somebody was only approving and not running transactions and one company I worked at saved a fortune by reorganizing the perpetual licenses.
  • Check what is included for reporting (used to be BI Suite which had Design studio, HANA Live, crystal reports, web intelligence, advanced office analysis, business objects etc. included but may have changed).
  • FSCM separate to main accounting license, if you had ordinary credit management you may now have to get FSCM.
  • Netweaver/web dynpro? (Learn SAP Netweaver training)

Migration
Many different paths, especially depending whether Public Cloud or not – public cloud is new implementation but there are tools (SLT) to upload data quite simply from another SAP system.
Considerations/Questions:
  • If planning to migrate in stages, you would have to go with a Greenfield migration or Central Finance.
  • On-premise system conversion – code-checker tool to check your bespoke ABAP programs do not write to tables, and for example whether there are any Z tables etc. You may want to understand more about this tool if you have a lot of bespoke programs.
  • Check whether your bespoke programs are calling other transactions/programs. Most old transactions that are obsolete call the new transaction instead but not all (e.g. display house bank FI13 gives the message “please use the Manage Banks and Manage Bank Accounts Apps) so would not work with bespoke programs calling a transaction code.
  • Look in to SLT (SAP Landscape Transformation) tool if legacy system is SAP.
  • Legacy Workbench functionality cannot be used in many areas for example Fixed assets and Business Partners, (does not support new data structure).

Rapid Deployment Solutions

This was deployed by SAP at a multinational project I worked on – they had a number or world templates and preconfigured building blocks in order to do a new implementation in a much shorter period of time than the traditional writing of the blueprint and then creating configuration line by line. 

Considerations/Questions

  • Worth looking into.
  • Check where it is available, not sure if replaced completely by Activate everywhere.
Reporting
Number of new options, with embedded analytics you should no longer need to wait overnight for data to be transferred to BW or a data-warehouse, no need to create permanent info-cubes. New concept in S/4 HANA (Learn ERP suite4 from SAP S/4HANA training) is that the reporting is real-time and virtual cubes or virtual data models that can easily be created as required. Some examples - Business Objects Design Studio, Lumira, Analysis for Office, HANA Live.
SAP Trainings Online is an interactive global training podium started by proven industry experts with an aim to provide quality SAP training in all SAP technical and SAP functional training courses. Our trainers are highly talented and have Excellent Teaching skills. They are well experienced trainers in their relative field. This training is your one stop & Best solution to learn SAP Simple Finance at your home with flexible Timings. We offer SAP module trainings conducted on normal training and fast track training online classes. 
Register with us for SAP training of your chosen module and get a free demo at: 
For more details visit: www.saptrainingsonline.com
Email: contact@saptrainingsonline.com
Contact: India +91 9052775398 USA +13152825809

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SAP S/4HANA Simple Finance Simplified Way to Finance | SAP Simple Finance Online Tutorials

SAP S/4HANA Simple Finance SAP’s Financial & Controlling module (one of the core modules from SAP, since its R/2 days) is a pretty mature offering with awesome breadth and depth. But over the years, the world has changed a lot. New financial regulations across the globe are necessitating change. There is also a need for lightning fast financials reporting.  The world of data is changing swiftly and financial operations must deal with enormous amounts of data processed at higher speeds and make sense of it. Considering this and to leverage its high-performance HANA platform, SAP has taken its Financial & Controlling module to the next level by launching “Simple Finance” (short form- SFIN) with SAP Business suite 4 HANA (i.e. S/4 HANA) ). And while doing it, SAP not only overcame some of the short-comings (of traditional FICO module) but also packed it with some powerful new features. Single Source of Truth In Simple Finance, SAP has introduced a new table named ‘

Introducing profitability analysis in SAP S/4HANA with 1709 Version

Understanding the importance of profitability analysis, key differences between costing- and account-based CO-PA, and discuss the improvements in account-based CO-PA with SAP S/4HANA Finance . Evaluate your business requirements and plan your SAP S/4HANA Finance integration, including important configuration steps for account-based CO-PA. When we talk about profitability analysis, you should keep in mind the different ways that profitability of a business is measured. There is an external view and internal view of profit for any business organization. The external view of profit is mostly driven and influenced by a number of statutory, tax, and regulatory requirements, whereas the internal view is driven by the management requirements of how business units, products, customer segments, and so on are performing. Traditional data models in enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems focused on data collection, aggregation, and reporting primarily to meet the external view o

SAP Simple Finance New Options in Profitability Analysis | SAP Simple Finance Tutorials

Even though Simple Finance sounds at the outset like a contradiction in semantics alone, SAP claims otherwise. SAP has built its product with a lot of well-thought out feature frameworks that brings about simple-to-use features along with real-time SAP HANA-powered (know HANA offerings from SAP HANA training ) and Cloud-based functionalities which are all pervasive in the IT domain today. Discover what changes in profitability analysis (CO-PA) when you use SAP HANA as a database. Learn how to link the general ledger and CO-PA and see what functional enhancements have been made to account-based CO-PA to provide greater transparency. Ensure that you get the best of both worlds: figures in the income statement that match the lines in CO-PA, but with sufficient detail to explore your manufacturing costs properly Learning objectives By reading this article, you’ll learn how: The use of SAP HANA as a database impacts profitability analysis (CO-PA) The data structure